• T156@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    Except that the numbers are also prone to change, like if it’s been stolen. They’re technically not supposed to be an identification code anyhow.

    • Tempy@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Right, but you can have entries in a block chain that indicate previous entries are no longer valid, or have modifications. Calculating a final state by walking through all the blocks in the chain. ( A bit like a CQRS based system can have a particular state at a point in time by replaying all events up to that point)

      Doing it in such a way also makes auditing what’s happened much easier since changes are inherently reflected in the chain. You want to know when (or by who if you keep that information) a record changes, it’s right their in the chain.