A new study argues that standard methods for counting emissions are outdated and incorrectly downplay animal agriculture's climate impact
  • houseofleft@slrpnk.netEnglish
    7·
    6 hours ago

    I’m not sure I follow, 17% sounds like a large amount and easily could be called “the leading cause” if the next highest industry is less that 17%?

    Are you thinking along the lines that 50%+ is needed before describing something as leading?