• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ah yes, the famously anti-Israel congress that would definitely be against Biden’s administration saying that they couldn’t find conclusive evidence of something that lots of other parties have found very conclusive evidence for.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I don’t understand the point you’re making. Congress does not report to the State Department.

      Congress is the Legislative Branch.

      The State Department is part of the Executive Branch.

      Deviating from advisement of both branches will find Biden in an impeachment hearing for acting in bad faith.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s really adorable that you don’t think the U.S. government, which has given Israel billions of dollars worth of weapons over the years and is sending them more and more as they bomb Gaza to ruin isn’t behind Israel 100% no matter what they do.

        I’m not sure why that isn’t totally obvious to you like it is almost the entire rest of the world, but…

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          It’s cool if you want to paint the entire problem with broad strokes, but don’t minimize the understanding of those who want the details. Accuracy is important to some of us.

          In the general sense of right vs. wrong, we’re in absolute agreement that it’s wrong. I’m just discussing how the government can do something about it.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              I don’t need you to send me news of atrocities I’ve already seen. I need the State Department to determine them to be in violation of international law so our President can do something about it without facing a trial.

              If you’ve been reading my comments with intent to understand, rather than looking for points to combat with general opinions, you’d already know that.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                5 months ago

                It was a 25-page UN report on genocide which, in fact, says that they are violating international law, and not a news article.

                So, again, how did the U.S. miss those really obvious details?

                Like I said, it’s a 25 page report so take your time reading it and tell me why the U.S. missed those details since you seem convinced that the U.S. assessment is correct.

                • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Again, you’re missing the point. It’s not about the UN report, or even the impending trial of Israel for genocide by the ICJ.

                  POTUS does not listed to news, protesters, the UN, the ICC, or the ICJ. They listen to US intelligence reports provided by the State Department. They can deviate from following advisement if backed by the support of Congress. Without either, they would be challenged by Congress in the form of an impeachment hearing.

                  Like it or not, this is how the US government is structured. Knowing how it works allows us to find the problem.

                  In this case, the problem is suppressed intelligence in the State Department. That doesn’t mean Biden is free to amend legislation without repercussion. He can mandate reassessment, investigate the suppression, or take action against advisement and inevitably face impeachment from Republicans.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Yet again, I am asking why the state department claims it is inconclusive and Biden accepts that claim if it is conclusive without any suppressed intelligence?