The source of your article is LinkedIn. Citing articles via a LinkedIn post still makes it a LinkedIn post. That isn’t peer reviewed. Stating fact based on your article and then sharing I’ve considered similar thoughts is not bad faith.
As usual for vegan communities, you’re assuming the worst. Immediately reporting a response that doesn’t 100% is why these communities are toxic.
Cherry-picking while conveniently ignoring the study.
You reported my comment 0_o, the article cites that source. Chill.
How can you tell that I made a report? I did it because you’re arguing in bad faith.
The sources mentioned in the article are:
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0284132
https://sustainablepetfood.info/vegetarian-feline-diets/#3
Because I’m an admin.
The source of your article is LinkedIn. Citing articles via a LinkedIn post still makes it a LinkedIn post. That isn’t peer reviewed. Stating fact based on your article and then sharing I’ve considered similar thoughts is not bad faith.
As usual for vegan communities, you’re assuming the worst. Immediately reporting a response that doesn’t 100% is why these communities are toxic.
You’re just focusing on the LinkedIn post while ignoring the substance of the article. Great a classic concern troll.