• insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Agreed, but I have doubts that this will be a massive improvement if the same amount of other sugars are used. I’m sure some things would reduce sugar to fit with production, but if some foods just became gritty (or, soda with sugar sinking to the bottom) I would not be shocked.

    Particularly because that seems like the easy-but-wrong-answer. Not that “maybe we shouldn’t make sugar cheaper than water” and “food doesn’t need to be loaded with sugar to taste good” should be unpopular opinions.

    • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Wait but like coke with regular sugar instead of hfcs isn’t gritty, nor does the sugar sink to the bottom.

      Is this a common thing? Stuff used sugar before hfcs and corn subsidies, and most people think shit tasted better that way, so now I’m confused as that’s not the case?

      • insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        My assumption here is that sugar would need to be dissolved, mixed, and emulsified with more care/difficulty than hfcs. Though if there is any issue here it might not be present until a product has sat on the shelf (or in your house) for too long. Also for gritty, I was thinking more for something like ketchup or other sauces.

        I’m also not saying this is a fault of sugar itself, but that hfcs allows highly sweetened products to be produced more easily (which may present said issue if high sugar content is kept 1:1 despite no longer using hfcs).

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Mexican coke is already cane sugar. That just means the US gets the good shit too.

          God help rfk if this somehow results in Americans losing access to their sodies, though.