He doesn’t have immunity for the crimes but there is testimony about things he said to staff while in office and the Supreme Court has declared such conversations off-limits. They really went out of their way to cover for Trump, except for the part where Biden would probably have immunity for having him killed.

The president couldn’t be charged for taking the billionaires’ money but the money could still be returned. An assassination can’t be undone.

I think he’d at least need to be clear on which part is a lie; did the killings not actually happen or are they not his fault?

Scrutiny!? Whatever will she do? (Tell Fox News she’s being persecuted, probably)

“There are so many other loopholes, we should focus on the ones poor people use”

Nick Fury was Black in the (first) Ultimate universe

The standard fine for violating the STOCK Act is $200, but frequently the House Committee on Ethics and the Senate Select Committee on Ethics waive the fee.

Craig Holman, a Capitol Hill lobbyist on ethics and campaign finance rules for nonprofit Public Citizen, said the fee is one of two reasons why the STOCK Act is frequently violated.

“The penalty is so minimal that these millionaire members of Congress really don’t care about it," Holman told Raw Story. “The second provision is the ethics committees are not really enforcing it or taking it seriously.”

So basically this “law” is just a suggestion.

Meanwhile, his classified documents case being handled by a judge he appointed to the court is somehow not a conflict.

Less likely isn’t the same as unlikely, most of those people probably just went from definitely voting for Trump to probably voting for Trump.

Well, you see, they don’t have cash on hand because they spent it on stock buybacks to boost that market cap

This week they were even against energy efficient applicances.