Well I see your point, but I’d suggest that it only stands in a casual/commercial context, research have been using it as an umbrella for the three paradigms I mentioned
- 1 Post
- 10 Comments
You cannot invalidate what is called AI just because of the advancements in the fields, what you just described although simple is indeed AI and automation was humanities first attempt at AI anyways. On the other hand yes OPs point of view is invalid and I think that’s just part of the meme
Not quite, AI is split into three paradigms: symbolic, connectionist and semi-symbolic, you only considered the connectionist one
Now that you bring it humans are interesting in peculiar ways, they went from putting human faces on cats to putting cat faces on humans in just about 500 years!
This picture scares me I can’t figure out how the light is bouncing or how the bars are attached
partzel@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•Yes, no AI is now a feature - TDF Community BlogEnglish
91·10 days agoThe way the commercialization of LLMs just ruined the word AI, word processors have been using AI in other ways for ages
partzel@lemmy.worldto
Technology@lemmy.world•AIs as Modern Genies - Schneier on SecurityEnglish
4·1 month agoIronically that’s literally what can happen with a genie, you will forbid them from something with guardrails but still find a way to give you what you did not want
People will hate me for this but:
Genshin impact and Wuthering Waves, the environment design, the art style, the emersion and the sounds all fit





Guess he sacrificed the child not its parent