At risk of getting myself banned (I guess a litmus test for myself to see how zealous the mods are here), one of the pioneering studies done in the field ended in suicide.
At risk of getting myself banned (I guess a litmus test for myself to see how zealous the mods are here), one of the pioneering studies done in the field ended in suicide.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Because you keep making salacious claims that can’t be properly sourced instead of focusing on provable arguments.
If it works well for the job
Your example is one where it clearly isn’t a great fit for the job. If you wanted to transfer sensitive data discretely, a floppy could be significantly better than a wired network where you’ve got to worry about America/Russia/China/Israel/Iran and who knows who else peeping on the transfer, or a USB drive which is already known to be compromised by stuxnet derivatives.
If it works well for the job that it’s tasked to perform, why change it? It’s got the added benefit of being an unintentional security feature now too, as very few others will even have a drive for reading them. Sort of like how manual transmissions are much less likely to be stolen now.
“It’s not that big of a deal” repeated enough times, is exactly how our society got to this state in the first place.
Three guesses on why they don’t track them, and if you invoke any events from the past 3 years you win a ban.
Money is what we all agree represents value
Well, that’s what it’s supposed to be, but in today’s digital world it is increasingly becoming only what a small handful of people agree represents value.
I think they are just bad at their jobs.
There are a huge number of aspired investigative journalists who weren’t good enough, and ended up writing niche interest pieces for hobbyist publications they don’t actually care much about. This was the reason there was such a commotion over game’s journalism around 2015, but the same problems exist elsewhere too.
Only reason people even need money is because we actively destroy the spaces we would need to live on the land without it.
Imagine basing your political ideology on whatever pisses people off.
And then you wonder why people don’t like you.
Don’t let them memory hole the opioid crisis.
This is clearly a deepfake. A real corporation would never risk a PR disaster by suggesting that people should fight for more rights.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
everyone else has been very thoughtful and engaging
Really? You’ve been picking fights with everyone in this thread?
Removed by mod