Of the Air (cele/celes)

pronouns: cele/celes

Plural. This is why we use we. Trans{gender and species}.

We aren’t human, thank you!

We are also ace- and aro- spec, so don’t direct sexual or romantic things at us.

  • 31 Posts
  • 383 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 20th, 2024

help-circle





  • Hello there, these are good questions. Thank you for asking them.

    Anarchy in theory is great and it is fairly obvious for small societies.

    The point here is that, societies may in fact have to be smaller to function, at least for a while, until people learn to work together better. They may interoperate through networks though, for a good example of this we recommend the book “A Half-Built Garden” by Ruthanna Emrys.

    The penalty system.

    Time and time again carceral and punitive system have shown not to work for their stated goals. It is likely we would switch to a restorative and transformative model of justice, that or use violence very careful, like a scalpel instead of how it is currently used: like a sword or a bomb, swinging widly around or destroying whole communities of people.

    Military forces. I mean like an anarchist country could already be a target.

    If people cooperate, share freely and aren’t held back from doing so then it is likely there wouldn’t be those problems, plus we would likely move on from the resources, and ways of thinking that caused this. Though yes that is a good question to ponder in transitional phases, likely there would be something akin to a military that worked for the people whilst they deconstructed both systems and thinking which caused this.

    anarchist country

    This is kind of a contradiction in terms, countries are a product of having a state/central system of authority which isn’t what anarchists are likely interested in having.

    And some person just trying to take the power while getting people join to them.

    Right, which is why education and community support would have to be improved in order to counter this kind of person or group, not through coercion but more through teaching people to think for themselves and how to weigh costs against benefits. We tend to think that people would be more for a collective, and caring system/community, especially once they saw the benefits and weren’t raised in a coercive, individualistic, and violent one.

    Like Idk maybe I am missing something or I’m dumb

    It’s okay to not understand things, that doesn’t make you dumb. However, we would recommend reading, watching and listening to some people who break it all down. We can give recommendations if you’d like?

    But I don’t think that’s the mayority of people.

    People are maleable and tend to perform better when there’s less or no violence, coercion and they can get rest, none of these things are currently offered by most socieites/communities people live in.

    Besides from a lot of people being agaonst the whole idea in the first place making it vey hard or almpst impoasible to mantain.

    A lot of people are against things that would benefit them until they see them in action, most fights against anarchist communites/societies have been top down rather than communities against them.

    That isn’t to say it wasn’t provoked by those communities, or couldn’t be, however, they usually use state aparatus in order to get their way which is why we have to dismantle the state or figure out ways to protective ourselves against it until we can maintain control in a transitional phase. Which yes, would not be easy, but it would be worthwhile.