My brain didn’t read the last line amd stopped at “nationalism is based” and reached a completely different conclusion 💀

The issue isn’t AI. The issue is private ownership of AI

https://www.news18.com/world/130-nukes-facing-you-pakistan-minister-threatens-india-as-tensions-rise-over-indus-treaty-suspension-9314913.html

Lower the price of the TV

If your keepass database is encrypted then backup it in cloud

Sovereignty is British occupation

For free stock images and videos https://search.creativecommons.org/ is a metasearch of creative common contents, https://www.freepik.com/ has free stock images but it has also introduced ai, https://pixabay.com/ also has many royalty free images. Check their license terms before using.

Using clips from other youtubers, historical footage etc would fall under fair use law (at least in usa, check your local laws) if you add your own content to it. There are detailed videos on fair use from youtube creator academy you can watch them.

I think they are expressing their discomfort with hexbear while also acknowledging that what OP said is extreme – these two sentiment can co-exist.

3rd point depends on how the VPN advertises itself. If it advertises itself as nordVPN used to do then it’s a scam. If it advertises itself what a vpn actually does then it’s not a scam

Best way to explain is probably not explain at all in the beginning and let them create an account in a well federated instance. That will not make them confused and learn by using it.

Lmao

Spiderman1, favorite since i was 10

“i voted because i thought tariffs would destroy the asians not the whites”

Comparing Xi with Ali leaves room for more interpretation :hehe:

Depends on the geography.

Still onlyfans exists.

“China will be lowering it’s wall when Europe will be building it’s own”

I use grayjay to watch twitch as i already use it to watch youtube. It works fine. Their privacy policy.

No

Will it be legal? Recently honey extension was caught doing this, though without user consent.

Even with user consent, would businesses work with firefox affiliate if it is not actually attracting sales, but taking a portion of sales, and thus reducing profit, just because the sale is made through the browser?

Firefox tried “privacy friendly ad” but that has also received community backslash because it turns users into products and doing anything like that would make their profit engine go boom and exploit private data. Wouldn’t the similar backslash also apply in affiliated sales?