when they think “animals”, they think of the culinary category of meat. Not animal as in “animal, mineral, or vegetable”. It’s an overloaded word.

I think it has to do with traditional (religious? catholics) categorization of flesh into meat, poultry, and fish. they think “animals” means “meat”

I guess I have to be the one to post it today: no investigation, no right to speak. Marxism will lead you to the correct analysis, but you have to actually have the facts in order to analyze them. Don’t get complacent.

vegans: animals have wants and needs

carnists: but what if APPLES had wants and needs? that’s why I am going to throw these live chicks into a grinder