

Maybe there’s more going on in McCarthy’s work than just world-weariness, whereas Mutis is focused on that sense of superficiality and jadedness to the point that it excludes other details and depths? Thanks for the thoughtful analysis, this was interesting to read.




I love this perspective. It’s true that it would be useful to know, for example, how much horror fans enjoy a horror novel vs. people who “don’t usually read this.”
At the same time, I can see how those reviews are useful for people who are looking to branch out from their usual genre, and tastes are not static across genres (or subgenres within those genres). A good reminder of how important it is to actually read individual reviews, as one reader’s two-star may arise from the exact same evaluation as another’s three or one-star review (or even wider margins of personal preference for what ratings represent!).