I think for the book it’s moreso chapter 10: “demonizing the Serbs” https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Library:To_kill_a_nation/Demonizing_the_Serbs

The propaganda campaign to demonize the Serbs began early in the decade. One of the Slovene government’s first acts after declaring independence in 1991 was to create a well-equipped media center that would distribute vivid reports about nonexistent battles, exaggerated casualty figures, and alleged Yugoslav army (Serbian) atrocities. By depicting the brief and limited conflict in the bloodiest terms imaginable, and portraying themselves as pro-West democrats struggling against Yugoslav Communist aggressors, the Slovenes hoped to marshal international support for their cause. Not long after, the Croats and Muslims did the same by conjuring up images of a dehumanized Communist Serbian threat to Europe.

Basically the Serbs are being portrayed by Parenti as poor innocent victims of NATO, but even by just looking at the massive civilian casualty rate it’s pretty obvious that’s not going to hold. Combine that with NATO actually favoring the Serbs by blocking weapons when only the Serbs had them, and the pro-Serb resolution of the genocide, and it turns out NATO didn’t actually favor the Croats or Bosnians as like Parenti claims.

BE basically addresses that at the beginning of the video.

Between 1960 and 1980 it had one of the most vigorous growth rates

Yugoslavia was a very successful nation until the 1980’s, but after the death of Tito the economy started stagnating and then it was ripe for ethnic tensions from the populations which had existed before to resurface. The Serbs with the majority voting in favor for pro-Serbs legislation didn’t help.

According to users it was a pretty decent model. Not the AGI promised for the billionth time, but it was able to slop out most tasks to at least get them to work.

What just because of the totenkopf emblem on their caps?

It’s not even alleged when the Palestinians didn’t do it. TheGuardian will happily claimed to have verified video footage of Hamas rapes which didn’t exist afterwards.

I guess after years of shouting “we need to violate your privacy to protect the children” they governments decided to not care and just ram through these measures despite people opposing them.

We’ve got every major NGO in the world saying Israel is committing genocide and the ICJ ruling that Israel is committing war crimes and needs to stop doing it in preliminary rulings. This nonsense might have worked in 2023.

You hit the nail on the head with that one.

Looks like the UK will need to verify the ID of everyone on social media to make sure what their age is. How awfully convenient.

Notice the lack of the word “occupy”

Banned me for what? No reason was given in the modlog except a vague “rule 1”.

You’re doing cosplay anti-Zionism while using all the Zionist slander you can find in order to defend Zionist Hasan Piker.

It’s a hyperbole of course there are some things which favored the Bosnians but likewise you can have Zionists saying NATO is pro-Palestine because NATO did a pro-Palestine thing once.

The process and end result was heavily Serb favored by NATO.

The casualty statistics as BE mentions in video chapter 2 “both sides are bad” (hey that’s what this argument is about how convenient) are also just telling by themselves: 83% of Bosnians killed were civilians. But “only” 10% of Serbs killed were civilians. This by itself basically proves that Bosnians did commit massacres on civilians but it wasn’t top-down policy like it was for the Serbs.

Certainly genocide is used as a convenient political term, (I’ve already watched that video quite a while ago) but even the Serbs were like “yep we’re doing genocide we want a state for Serbs only!”. Then they ordered top-down systemic massacres of Bosnians and Croats.

The casualty statistics as BE mentions are also just telling by themselves: 83% of Bosnians killed were civilians. But “only” 10% of Serbs killed were civilians. This by itself basically proves that Bosnians did commit massacres on civilians but it wasn’t top-down policy.

Did you watch the video yet while you support a Zionist?

This is a lie you are simply a Zionist. Anyone can write anything in a modlog.

Oh well as he said life goes on.

The “Republic Srbpska” went from 55% Serbs to 90% Serbs by genociding Bosnians

The Serbs enacting laws favoring themselves after the death of Tito did a great job of spreading those ethnic tensions as well. Sure NATO loves doing divide and conquer but it’s not a one-sided affair there.

And it in no way explains why NATO would block arms to the Bosnians while the Serbs had plenty of weapons leading to the one-sided massacres. Nor why they would reward the Serbs for doing genocide afterwards.

You can ignore a 30 minute video full of receipts and substitute in your own reality after adhomming the author but you are still completely unable to explain how the NATO weapons blockade actually favored the Bosnians. In any case we’re done with this discussion you clearly have nothing.