More relevant to current events and more likely to sell subscriptions
More relevant to current events and more likely to sell subscriptions
A quick scan of the article makes it clear what they mean here:
A political party with an armed wing
Looking at it through that lense it isn’t a terrible take but a gross oversimplification of Hezbollah
I appreciate the effort here. One major flaw I see in your argument is ignoring historical context. You point to the CPC being very wealthy and owning a large amount oy stock and businesses and use that to argue other parties should too, but you leave off the how and why the CPC owns so much. It wasn’t as you argue others should do, by out competing capitalists, but rather due to their actions after their successful revolution. I’d suggest elaborating more on this to see if you can reconcile some issues in your proposal. Additionally I’d consider how capitalists are trying currently to do what you suggest the communist parties do, to essentially buy out all competition.