Incomprehensible, have a nice day

exercising freedom of association makes you lonely

~ insufferable nerds with whom nobody willingly associates, circa 2024

Gnarly, dude!

No it should not be the decision of the parents, it should be the decision of the patient and their doctors.

stop usibg [sic] ur brain and thinking for yourself

You don’t need to tell them to do that, they clearly already did before commenting. But then, so did you.

Holy shit you have absolutely no idea what the fuck you’re talking about, so please shut the fuck up about your uninformed personal opinions.

Puberty blockers only delay the onset of puberty until you stop taking them, at which point development resumes normally with far less downsides than the risk of developing undesired sex characteristics. So no, this is not “the same choice no matter if we ban or allow this.” The same choice would be starting actual sex hormones; puberty blockers are the middle ground here.

Banning puberty blockers is politically motivated actors putting their politics above people’s bodily autonomy and medical professionals’ ability to make medically informed decisions.

You’re flat out wrong that allowing doctors to prescribe puberty blockers would cause risk of greater suffering in such a way as to make it abundantly clear that you don’t know what those meds actually do.

You are a fucking moron. Username checks out.

Sure, but Biden/Harris hemmorrhaged about 15,000,000 voters between 2020 and 2024 due to lacking messaging that appealed to the electorate. Turns out that “this guy is a fascist but also we want to do bipartisanship with his party” doesn’t really appeal to people.

Tbh I’m just glad I’m not some sort of heterosexual

“radical feminism” refers to a specific ideology born of the second wave, not just any feminism that is radical.

Ah yes, decades of hardship and adversity has led to the systemic marginalisation in society of… checks notes… white men.

Mate how old are you? This is some 14-year-old-who-browses-gamersriseup tier shit. You made me chuckle, I’ll grant you that, but damn it’s pathetic.

Didn’t they start shoving AI bullshit into it? Kinda undermines the point.

Well shit, these crackers must be really brittle.

splat “I am a steg-o-saurus!”

What protections? Give me some concrete examples of what you’re talking about here.

That’s a terrible example. Gendered bathrooms would still fulfil their function if anybody could use them regardless of gender, causing no measurable harm to anyone.

Assuming good faith on the part of those involved, I don’t see how inclusivity comes at the cost of effectiveness. Would you care to elaborate?

Sure, the anatomical features we use to categorise people into genders have always existed, but the categories themselves are made up and there’s a rather large amount of overlap between them. The more strictly someone attempts to enforce a given set of criteria as the basis for this categorisation, the less practical utility their definition tends to have in terms of everyday use.

Yeah righto champ 👍

I wish we lived in the hard left world you munted fuckwits have nightmares about.

Simple, right up until you actually try to enact such a scheme, at which point its logistical infeasibility drives you to liquidating large subsets of the population instead.

It’s called the final solution because it wasn’t exactly plan A.