![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.zip/pictrs/image/fbe4883b-64d2-4dbf-953d-789e884f5d6b.webp)
Wow I’m sure glad that the for-profit healthcare here means we get the highest quality healthcare in the world :-) That’s why we pay exorbitant prices for it :-)
Wow I’m sure glad that the for-profit healthcare here means we get the highest quality healthcare in the world :-) That’s why we pay exorbitant prices for it :-)
a community discussing collapse can’t stay in a place which denies overshoot of the ecosystem carrying capacity. The Reese paper doesn’t say a thing about eugenics.
Okay then, what do you propose we do if you believe we’ve overshot our carrying capacity?
We need to start distributing resources more effectively, not culling people. The majority of the human population consumes very little.
When people talk about overpopulation they always want to get rid of people other than the ones in their own home country, strangely. When the advocates for such policies are in first world nations that consume considerably more than the people they want to get rid of.
Let me ask you this: if you believe the earth has exceeded its carrying capacity, wouldn’t your conclusion be to start getting rid of people or halting their reproduction? That’s textbook eugenics…
what the fuck