

Yeah when the whole thing starts by referencing Games of Throne, you know it’s going to be bullshit.


Yeah when the whole thing starts by referencing Games of Throne, you know it’s going to be bullshit.


And yet people keep on defending AI because it’s “practical” and makes things a bit faster (sometimes, if you don’t care about the quality or usability of the result)


It definitely is easier than it looks, the only hard part is to manage the blade to not break it, and you just learn it over time. A funny thing that I found surprising at the beginning was reading that to know if the blade is having proper tension, you flick it and listen to the noise it makes, a bit like a musical instrument; it sounded absurd at first, but now I’m able to get a sense of how much tension there is by doing it. It’s still nothing amazing, it just gets a bit of time to learn it “instinctively”, but I find it funny ^^


I don’t have any, but I have some of an old craft that I made as training from pretty long ago. I plan on making a video showing the process of crafting, but it’s not done yet…
(Don’t pay attention to the pattern, I just took it online to train myself on a design with a lot of holes)
First I print the pattern, glue it on the metal and drill a hole in each hole of the design

I put the blade of the saw through each hole to cut it along the pattern (this shows the back to make it more visible bur I just saw along the lines of the print, I don’t do it blindly)



Finally I remove the paper and polish the craft with mainly small brushes on a rotary tool

I have small files, but most of the shape is just cut with a blade, that is indeed a bit of a magical super tiny one :') The blade is extremely thin, which helps for details but make it very prone to breaking, that’s why you need to be rather gentle while working with it. But they also come in packs of over 100 of them, which helps :p



deleted by creator


Yes, they have the lovely tendency of trying to bend instead of cut, it can be stressful


Now that’s some acrobatics


Thank you, I don’t think I make anything amazing but I appreciate the compliment!


Just a followup. Western countries being on the wrong side of history comes with being the “dominant” power for quite a while. That comes when you mix power and people that don’t care much about morals (which is most people who own this power). Russia has also been on the wrong side of history a bunch of times. My point was, history has a meaning but is not all that matters, and you can’t necessarily interpret the present through the scope of history.
Well now we’re adding more assumptions. It’s not just that Ukraine would be nazis, but that they are having NATO involved in the whole thing. And that’s a bigger assumption considering that no one gave a flying fuck about Ukraine (or had a negative view of it, for not such bad reasons) until Zelensky did his little stunt to shame Europe into helping them. And even then, it has been a drop by drop help, because everyone is scared of Russia.
And I don’t see how opening borders and basically playing “nice” could specifically lead to hostility. If Ukraine is a crazy violent country that wants to exterminate Russians, then they would attack eventually either way; evacuating people to Russia before the military conflict would just protect civilians instead of letting them be in the middle of the warzone.
As for Crimea “democratically joining Russia”, that’s a big pill to swallow. I understand your scope of “western propaganda bias”, but once again, no one is really believing Russia to be a democracy or to even like the idea of it, so I don’t really see how a foreign area would democratically decide to join a dictatorship. It makes it feel like this “democratic” process would then be of the same kind that leads Putin to win all elections forever with 99% of votes and dead political opponents, while removing the democratic safeguards preventing too many reelections.
And I’ll also add that in terms of purely cold reasoning, extracting people from Ukraine before going at war also means more people to support the war, so it doesn’t really make sense to rush into it. Especially considering that it was obvious that the US would lose power over time, with Trump and whatever, as well as a lot of other western countries.
That’s the whole problem with the narrative of Russia playing the victim: in the end, starting the war didn’t make sense both on a material and a diplomatic scope. It does make sense, however, if you consider Russia to be the one that wanted to attack (and there are a bunch of reasons, very simply speaking Ukraine was an unpopular country with a lot of land and big food production, it probably seemed like an easy and valuable target).
Don’t get me wrong, I have no love for western countries. That’s why from the very first time I started hearing about the conflict between Israel and Palestine being ambiguous, and people supporting Israel heavily in western countries, I just read about it and concluded that yeah, Israel was obviously wrong in that case, and they kept on proving it afterwards. I have no problem considering that western news can be full of shit, and admitting that there definitely is propaganda going on (just like everywhere, but people still believe that western democracies are actual democracies, and that they are immune to propaganda, for some reason), and making my own conclusions based on what seems to make sense. But with Russia, the idea that Russia did what they did out of morals and out of trying to help against oppression, doesn’t really fit the facts. I can obviously be wrong, but with the way things have been unfolding, I don’t see enough evidence to consider that this narrative is the real one. And sure, maybe some part of it is slightly true and exaggerated, it’s totally possible that there was systemic discrimination against a Russian “ethnicity” in Ukraine, their country was basically a political removed. But that’s not enough to make the Russian narrative believable.


But how many countries have been on the “right side”? You can look at most western countries history and most events will be on the wrong side. Even the ones fighting the nazis during ww2 were doing it for shitty reasons half of the time. Yes, the US is shit, and generally siding with the US is a problem; that doesn’t mean that you should side with Russia. “The enemy of my enemy is my friend” is a bullshit saying that just means that you can be opportunistic to take advantage of the situation, it’s not a good moral stance.
I find it easy to say that opening the borders would be too much to handle. Rescuing people is too much to handle, but launching yourself in an endless war that causes gigantic amounts of casualties, this is doable? I call bullshit.
And once again, the problem is the proof. What you describe in Ukraine is a symptom of the decline of modern democracies, it’s a disease, not an intention. France right now is passing a law giving a right to kill to cops, after years of anti-immigration policies and nazis in various levels of the government. It’s not because the country is nazi, it’s because nazis are trying to take control of it. If you attack France right now, guess who will take advantage of the crisis and seize control of the country to “save” it? The nazis that have been hoping for an opportunity. And if anything, that’s happened in Ukraine too, with former nazis being integrated in the army because they weren’t visibly doing nazi things anymore, and Ukraine desperately needed soldiers. Crises just help fascists, and Russia is going to do nothing other than strengthen the nazis both in Ukraine and in other western countries. If anything, Russia is the one pushing countries like Ukraine to become actual nazi countries, and it’s a common pattern in history - that’s how Napoleon destroyed the basis of democracy in France, he took advantage of a crisis and everyone let him be a crazy murderous dictator.
Tl,dr: if you want to attack nazis, you need to make sure that you’re actually attacking nazis, and not just destroying everything and everyone that you see. That’s the difference between the resistance in ww2, and Israel now fighting the “terrorists” by flattening out the whole country and murdering civilians. Right now, Russia is much more similar to Israel because they are just attacking indiscriminately, and that definitely pushes me to believe that the “nazi” thing is bullshit, and an excuse for oppression.


The US being wrong does not make its enemies right. I don’t think that right now, in the current way the world is, there is much of a “good side” because most countries are doing horrible shit. If you start going for the lesser evil, you accept that as the new norm and it continues worsening.
Yes, I do disagree. Because even if it were to be true, Russia is still doing things in the worst possible way. Ukraine is having nazis? Then influence their elections (which Russia loves to do) to make them shift away from it. Find economic or political leverage to pressure them. Setup rescue operations or diplomatic passage for the potential victims. But steamrolling the whole country, killing basically everyone you can on your way? I’m sorry, that’s not how it works.
If Ukraine is made of nazis, then the nazis must be taken care of, yes. But what Russia is then doing (assuming that what you’ve been saying were to be true), is the equivalent of the US dropping a bunch of nuclear bombs on a Japan at the brink of surrender, or of the winners of WWI dismantling Germany to “punish” it for its leadership, or of Israel trying to conquer and destroy all the countries around it that it doesn’t like. Or even, of all those western countries that use the excuse of counter-terrorism to consider every individual a potential threat that deserves death. It’s an oppressor move, and these cannot be supported.
A powerful country like Russia has many ways to solve any conflict or problem, and if they pick the violent, oppressive, indiscriminate way, then they are wrong.


They follow the same morals as the “US empire” though.
Also, it’s circular reasoning. You believe that Russia is right according to Russian sources that don’t seem very coherent, because you believe that Russia is right. I have yet to find any convincing evidence of Ukraine being a nazi country, and as the one that started the attack, the charge of the proof falls onto Russia. I have seen the “proof” they were using at the beginning of the invasion, and it was absolutely not convincing, it was some cherrypicking of obsolete links that didn’t mean much anymore. And after that, most of the justifications used were sounding like Trump’s justifications to attack random countries. Ironically enough, the US and Russia are very similar.
For me I believe in only supporting moral stuff, and I’m not going to defend an oppressive fascist dictatorship, even if they are attacking other fascists. And in this case, the second part is yet to prove.
Supporting the lesser evil is also what led to all current democracies falling into fascism and discrimination. If you take a look at France, Macron has been seen as the lesser evil, and has been consistently and successfully popularizing and supporting the far right. The lesser evil is still evil.


So Russia loves its “own people” so much, fine.
What about LGBT people that it hunts down?
What about political opponents that it murders?
What about the soldiers that it keeps on sending to their deaths, that are much more numerous than whatever “genocide” Ukraine could have been doing from their border?
What about the people sent to forced labor in jail for doing nothing else than voice a slight critic of Putin, and that then get sent to the frontlines?
You can bullshit whatever you want about Russia, saying that it cares about its own people is bullshit. And even if they did, being fine invading countries to “protect your own people” is a very typically fascist thing, and the nazis were fond of this idea for example.
Russia is supporting Iran against Israel? Then why not support Palestine, who needs support even more, and from long before? Seems like they don’t care so much about nazis, just about what geopolitical conflict they can profit from.


There’s people in powerful positions making nazi salutes in front of crowds. There’s governments doing a minute of silence to honour a nazi terrorist that died while attempting an attack. There’s most of the western world supporting a genocidal Israel. Even if what you said was true, it goes with a general trend and is unrelated to Ukraine. The question remains, why Ukraine and not a more influential country first?
And again, even assuming that what you said is true… Do you really, actually believe that this would be fighting against the nazis, not just fighting exclusively for the interest of Russian people? If those alleged nazi Ukrainians were killing Americans instead of Russians, Russia would do the same? It’s all about personal gain, there is nothing about fighting fascism here.


They are not condemning the nazis, they are using it as an excuse. Do you really believe that an openly fascist dictatorship is hostile to fascism? And who said that you cannot be openly nazi? Have you not seen all the nazi salutes being done in front of crowds by various pieces of shit all over the world? What timeline are you living in? The time when nazis would have to hide is long, long gone. It feels like you’re living in an alternate universe to be able to say that.
Anyway, let me get this right. Putin wants to exterminate minorities, but then he fights nazis? Oh please, be serious.
And let’s push the argument then. There are nazis in Ukraine, so the country deserves to be invaded. There are nazis all throughout Europe (actually a big current problem), so Putin should invade all of Europe, possibly the whole world. So your solution to fascists is to have a dictator conquer the world? (And if you’re going to argue that he’s not a dictator, well you’re too far gone I guess.) Also, why pick Ukraine specifically, instead of all the more influential countries that also have nazis? It’s very convenient that the one nazi country Russia targets is one that has desirable territory for Russia, what a stroke of luck!
And finally, I’m not going to see errors of my opinions if Russia wins because I’m not going to believe the show they make of their defeated enemy, history is written by the winners and the fact that you believe a win from Russia would prove that they are right shows the lack of rationality in your opinion.
To see errors of my opinions, I’d need Russia to lose or stop attacking, and to see Ukraine go clearly full nazi now that the threat is gone. And I don’t see that happening any more than it has been happening with all modern “democracies” that are failing due to a weakness to the fascist ideology in its new form; and if Ukraine has nazis just like other democracies, that would still defeat the narrative of Russia, that “Ukraine is nazi”, and just show that nazis are a threat for Ukraine and democracies in general.
Your message is basically empty of substance, as if you cannot even find any in what you’re thinking. Maybe it would be time to think about what you think, for once.


The difference being that when you try to compare sources and find out what is actually going on, the bullshit defending Israel doesn’t hold, but the things about Russia do.
Or is it that the concept is that once you see that someone is lying, you assume that they are the only ones lying, and the only ones unable to say the truth, and you start blindly believing another liar?
Also the whole thing with Russia invading Ukraine is that they’re claiming they are nazis, how do you explain that western countries that are heavily and openly supportive of nazis, would suddenly try to bullshit and deny that Ukraine is a nazi country? The same governments that do a minute of silence when a nazi terrorist gets killed during an attempted attack, that support the genocide in Palestine, would suddenly get cold feet and just deny that Ukraine is a gigantic nazi country? If it were the case, they wouldn’t deny it, they would start saying that no “democracy” can be attacked for its political decisions and basically defending the nazi rights. For them not to be doing that means that the nazi narrative is just bullshit.
But I don’t know why I’m bothering trying to argue here, you can’t really debunk someone brainwashed by propaganda with just a few messages.


At first, when you see people criticizing the .ml people, you think it’s exaggerated or a stereotype.
Then they come bringing obsolete russian propaganda from the bottom of the ass of nowhere, and you change your mind.
I can’t believe that even the world war propaganda, where news would say things like “the enemy bullets don’t kill and bounce off of our soldiers while they are sipping tea”, was better done that what this post tries to do.
Now waiting for some random absurd reply from op telling me that I’m an nazi supporter because I don’t support the fascist genocidal invader or something. ¯\(ツ)/¯


deleted by creator
“Some of the propaganda contains truth” is a weird ass sentence that cannot really be framed in any other way than someone supporting said propaganda.
It’s like saying “some of the conspiracy theories contain truths”, it only works if you believe in them.
Information used to manipulate is useless, trying to cherry pick what is “true” is absurd. It’s like seeking a mouldy bread just to try to pick the edible parts, instead of trying to get a proper loaf of bread.