Thanks comrade!
Thanks comrade!
What did she do?
Apparently Leninism is a wider term including ML, Trotskyism, and other tendencies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leninism
So it wouldn’t be wrong call MLs Leninist, or just Marxist if you want to cast an even wider net.
Lenin was very serious about staying true to Marx, to the point of quoting entire pages to be sure he’s not taking things out of context. His work is Marx’s thought applied to economical and political developments Marx couldn’t have foreseen, but it’s in no way revisionist. I think this is why Stalin called it “Marxism-Leninism”, to make sure it’s clear this is Marxism.
Still you have “orthodox Marxists” who will claim ML is not really Marxism but I think if it was called just “Leninism” it would’ve been even easier for them to claim Leninism isn’t even Marxism.
Wasn’t the falling out with Vietnam essentially a side effect of Sino-Soviet split? Mao wanted Vietnam as China’s satellite while Vietnam wanted independence and wouldn’t cut ties with the USSR.
X (formally known as Twitter) gon’ give it to ya
He literally calls sex workers “wh*r*s” in the piece I linked which is supposed to be serious Marxist economic theory.
I don’t support prostitution (I also never use the term swerf because it draws completely incorrect parallels between sex work legalisation and trans liberation) but this is deplorable.
Obviously I’m not the first person to notice it and he kept it like that on his blog for years so it’s exactly what he meant to say, too.
I forgot to save that picture of Yahya with a pistol wearing white shirt and black suit. He was pulling the gun out, very much like an action movie still. Now I can’t find it, help?
Lol holy fuck…
OK so they find the term “Global South” confusing geographically (South Korea is in the ‘Global North’, and North Korea in the ‘Global South’, what a conundrum) and economically (tax havens have high GDP which apparently means they’re rich lol).
Of course they proceed using the term “Western states” repeatedly without getting confused over implied geography! Germany is to the east of France and China is to the west of Japan, how do you tell which ones are Western?
They also repeatedly use the term “neo-imperialist” in relation to China and Russia not bothering to explain what “neo-imperialism” is supposed to be and how those states fit that description.
Anyway, their actual gripes are with the following:
The horror! The rightful place of The West as slave owners and colonisers is under attack, and other nations expect their needs to be heard rather than The West rolling over everything as they did for centuries. The West needs to exercise some of that good old military “hard power” against them, no more mister nice guy!
But enough about what they don’t like! What would they actually like? The answer to that is in the link at the bottom, here are my highlights:
In short - more of the good old imperialism to combat the “neo-imperialism”! More spooks, more propaganda, more meddling both diplomatic and economic via “aid” programs… And first and foremost, more escalation against China and Russia.
Sorry, I must be wrong then! I never looked into this, that’s just what I remember reading back then.
removedshott uses the W word completely unironically there, he just openly hates victimised women, which is truly appalling behaviour that should get him booted from any communist party.
Disclaimer: I don’t support prostitution although for different reasons, pasting below my comment about it from another thread:
I used to think this is simply, “sex workers are the ones carrying all the risk and harm, so only their opinion matters. sex worker organisations call for full decriminalisation. /thread”
Until I learned decriminalisation of sex work in the first world leads to increased human trafficking from the Global South: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X12001453#s0045
To put it bluntly, brown women who would otherwise lead their normal lives, are kindapped and smuggled to be raped by white men, in large numbers, whenever a first world country decriminalises prostitution.
This works both ways - criminalising prostitution reduces human trafficking, as shown above in the case study.
People trafficked from the Global South are completely marginalised and poweless, they don’t have a voice. The voices we hear, calling for decriminalisation, are mostly from self employed Westerners. And while I genuinely do care about their right to safer work conditions, for me it doesn’t trump the right of brown women to not be kidnapped and raped by white men.
I can’t comment there cause don’t have an account on Lemmy, but consider adding:
BreakThrough News
Peoples Dispatch
Empire Files
Also please consider removing Paul removedshott, he hates sex workers (CW):
Why should we ‘listen to the sex workers’? Why are we to be so solicitous of the commercial interests of brothel keepers and wh**es?
Source: https://paulremovedshott.wordpress.com/2017/12/01/socialists-can-never-support-prostitution/
He’s a TERF and believes there’s simply no such thing as gender, only biological sex:
https://paulremovedshott.wordpress.com/2017/12/12/genders-or-sex-stereotypes-part-1/
https://paulremovedshott.wordpress.com/2017/12/13/genders-or-sex-stereotypes-part-2/
https://paulremovedshott.wordpress.com/2017/12/23/genders-or-sex-stereotypes-part-3/
He doesn’t agree with unequal exchange theory, which in turn leads him to conclude that Western workers are subjected to a higher rate of exploitation than workers in the Global South (which is a necessary conclusion without accounting for unequal exchange):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNIUK7d8bRM
No idea what happened after he disappeared, sorry!
Please don’t advertise Paul removedshott, he hates sex workers (CW):
Why should we ‘listen to the sex workers’? Why are we to be so solicitous of the commercial interests of brothel keepers and wh**es?
Source: https://paulremovedshott.wordpress.com/2017/12/01/socialists-can-never-support-prostitution/
He’s a TERF and believes there’s simply no such thing as gender, only biological sex:
https://paulremovedshott.wordpress.com/2017/12/12/genders-or-sex-stereotypes-part-1/
https://paulremovedshott.wordpress.com/2017/12/13/genders-or-sex-stereotypes-part-2/
https://paulremovedshott.wordpress.com/2017/12/23/genders-or-sex-stereotypes-part-3/
He doesn’t agree with unequal exchange theory, which in turn leads him to conclude that Western workers are subjected to a higher rate of exploitation than workers in the Global South (which is a necessary conclusion without accounting for unequal exchange):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNIUK7d8bRM
IIRC he wore a mask and used a voice changer because he was a lawyer so online extremism would cost him his job. Which is why he had to drop his YT channel after being doxxed.
Geopolitical Economy Report - news and analysis
BreakThrough News - news and analysis
Peoples Dispatch - news and lectures
First Thought - essays on current issues
Empire Files - interviews and documentaries on CIA and Palestine
Prolekult - very good Marxist documentaries
Belly of the Beast Cuba - documentaries on Cuba
Fear of a Brown Planet - leftist stand-up
This series by Jacobin is IMHO a really good primer into leftism for libs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDg71ql7zQs&list=PLxlNhP2f0kULW8hdxvfF6ZcDbndpvF8Sb
Bonus, probably my favourite picture ever, even though not USSR:
Dutch resistance members celebrate when they hear the news of Adolf Hitler’s death, May 1945.
ah the glorious MoreTankieChapo times
I don’t like it, they look white and wear the most iconic USA outfit possible (white tee and denim trucker jacket), this combined with “Change” in English and scyscraper skyline just doesn’t scream sovereinty to me.
USian “working class” is actually labour aristocracy / petty bourgeois. Those classes are always the driving force behind the rise of fascism. Case in point: Trump.