It sure is. And the alternative is dying.

For some more applicable advice, time bound you commitment to this cause. 10 minutes a day? 2 hours a week? 10 hours a month? Doesn’t matter. Get it a set amount of time, and dont let it bleed into your other priorities often.

Thinking about something advocacy sized and slow moving all the time will burn you out. I’ve learned this through my cycling route advocacy. It gets the time I dedicate to it. No more, but no less.

Timothy Zhan’s Thrawn trilogy came out 1991-93.

Then the Timothy Zhan Thrawn trilogy came out in 2017-19.

There’s also the 2020-21 Timothy Zhan Thawn:Acendency trilogy, but I haven’t read that one.

The best part about reading the Thrawn Trilogy, is reading the Thrawn Trilogy afterwards to compare them.

more kinetic energy will impart more speed to the human during the impact impulse.

Partially correct, the speed (technically acceleration) of the human after a collision is limited by the decceleration of the moving object caused by thr human. Since a car and a truck decellerate about the same amount when receiving the counter-acceleration of the human, the force transfer remains similar.

The bowling ball will not slow down in the slightest when is hits the beach ball, accelerating the beach ball up to it’s speed.

The plastic ball will lose significant speed hitting the beach ball, decelerating itself significantly as it accelerates the beach ball.

I’m going to pick some easy math speeds/masses for demonstration. 2,000 kg sedan, 4,000 kg pickup and 100 kg human. Starting velocities of 20m/s and 0m/s. An impact/acceleration time of 1s.

The sedan hits a pedestrian with (f=ma) of 40kN. It takes 2kN to bring the human up to 20 m/s. So the sedan will be somewhere around 38kN, or 19m/s at the end of it and the human absorbing 1.8-2kN.

The truck has f=80kN. Same 2kN for the human. So the truck will be somewhere around 78kN or 19.5m/s at the end. With the human absorbing 1.9-2kN

In either case the we talking a difference of 1.8-2kN for the human. Regardless the mass (and total force) of the vehicle, the relatively small human as a maximum force they can absorb. And that maximum force is heavily related to the speed of the larger object.

Not to say trucks/SUVs aren’t deadly for other reasons (like where and how the force os transferred)

And then there is the SUV class. Aka the non-passenger work vehicle family passenger vehicle.

Like this?

My understanding is that China has always had a cycling culture of some sort, not a 5-10 year explosion like Paris saw?

Most bike-friendly cities I’ve visited in the last ten years fall into two categories: 1) a comprehensive network that’s been intentionally incorporated into the infrastructure across decades, or 2) quick-and-dirty changes that work really well on some streets with a comprehensive network to be desired. Paris has built a comprehensive network with mostly quick-and-dirty changes in less than ten years. And it’s obvious just riding around that these changes continue to iterate. I was most delighted to track how the striping below my feet had been scraped and relocated as evidence that the bike lanes had been expanded. It’s a work in progress, and that progress is working.

I felt that paragraph adressed it pretty clearly. It’s not that Paris is doing better than X Netherland city. It’s that Paris is tackling the problem with a quick and dirty, but still comprehensive, network. An approach that can be modelled in other cities, even without decades of working towards the goal.

An approach that has inspired me to delegate in my own city as a way to get after this.

It feels like every game studio is laying off right now?

And property tax isn’t?

Neat.

Doesn’t solve the massive infrastructure bill, land use requirements, and safety issues of cars though.

Land Value Tax.

Land Value Tax / Georgism.

Transit should be free.

Yes.

There is some nuance to this. Transit SHOULD be free, but it takes extremely strong political will to improve transit (add more funding) once it has been made free.

Example: X transit is 50% government funded and 50% fare funded.

Government decides to make if free, 100% government funded. Great!

Or government decides to increase funding to 100%, but fares remain. Now there is a 150% budget to improve the transit.

At 50 kph tires are louder. From 30-50 kph tires can be louder.

There’s a lot of factors (notably vehicle weight, tires type and tire age)

Mon calice, this is tellement useful!

I’m not sure how that is a disadvantage compared to being on the power grid? If you are on the power grid, and the grid goes down, you also don’t have power.

What is this a disadvantage compared to?

Need BOT for factorio to make factory grow.

Not much noise reduction. After 50 kph, tires are louder than engines anyways.

Sure there are the occasional busted/“tuned” exhaust comes out very loud, but the majority of the din is just wheels on the road.

Daily driving a non-passenger work vehicle family passenger vehicle.