The law should be changed because you have fallen for right wing bull crap.

The law was created in the 1950s with the UK as a major proponent of that law. Yet we have had 0 wars on UK soil since then.

Where as nations bordering wars have had multiple wars expand into their territory as refugees run to escape. Seriously, you seem totally unable to base any of your arguments on facts or logic. But just emotional rubbish pushed by right wing lies and folks fighting for fascism.

You are inventing divisions where non existent.

For starters there is absolutely no law or history where war refugees are required to settle in the first safe nation. Much the opposite the Geneva convention makes it illegal to use access or distance to limit the movement of refugees. This is specifically their as forcing nations nearest a war zone to accept refugees would increase the odds of the war spreading into their borders.

As for the difference between EU and refugees. Given the whole Brexit history that is an utterly dumb complaint. It has absolutely no marit in this debate as the flag was specifically used to argue against all type of immigration in recent times.

This is a good question.

It changed because the statement people hung the flag for decades is entirely recent history. Anyone over 50 knows it is not the case,

It is true of the union jack. Although since Victorian times not hugely so and often seen as tacky. But the St Georges flag dropped from use before the 1980s.

The reason is pretty clear. From about the mid 1800 most major English political parties have been unionist. It is a part of the Tory party name. But all 3 major parties and most smaller parties in England have been unionist.

We have no major England separation party. Whereas the other 3 nations all have such parties. Calls for England as an independent nation. Have never had a majority or even significant following.

As such the flag of England dropped out of use in the mid 1800s. As the main parties were successfully pushing the Union Jack as the main flag for England. In an attempt to diminish the separation parties of other nations. And no vocal group in the nation of England was opposing the lose.

As such when the National Front. Then BNP etc etc started to use the St Georges flag as a call to remove all non white from the UK. Opposition was very much directed at the ideals. Not the use of a flag few felt a link to.

Even now. Few have any real link to England as a separate nation. Just no real opposition to the flag any more then a link to it. It is seen by the vaste majority. More as the harm created by multiple negative party affiliations. Then as some national symbol of the English.

You realise this in no way argues against the bias argument right.

Exactly what I said. Oppose the use of the flag as a intent to scare immigrants.

While making reasoned and rational arguments for and against different immigration policies.

Of course the above is as unbiased as it can be.

But as someone with more left of centre ideals.

It’s not complex. As a nation we have always depended on immigration. Angle Celts and Jutes immigrated to this nation before the flooding of dogger bank some 12k years ago. Much as in the rest of the world. Excluding the plains of Kenya. No human is entirely native to any one nation. Mixing of cultures and people has always advantages the human race.

But the right wing is very much being intentional in their use of other to distract the people. It is a key goal of fasism.

The rights use of the flag as an element of fear. Is both intentional and a long known core element of fascist ideology.( Ultra nationalism and the selectionof a enemy class. ). intended to control opposition to the elite.

Absolutely nothing the right claim as an issue to the UK is the fault or responsibility of immigration.

While all the issues that drive people to accept such claims. Are the result of intentional reductions in rights and equality lead by 50 plus years of right of centre governments.

As bad as godwins law can be. Their is a reason so many of the rights actions match 1930 Germany.

Solid advice above. 3d printing on these things is a huge issue initially. Set up etc is very fiddly. And this is with a new set up with everything documented by the manufacturer. As soon as you start playing with the mess others have made dealing with the same issues. More so after having dismantled and moved a set up to sell.

Really not a fun task for a first timer.

Once you have done it once and understand the issues involved and just how minor errors can mess with plate adhesive and other issues. It would be a fine purchase. But not that cheap. 1/2 price of a newer model seems normal.

But it is also worth remembering. While these printers are very upgradeable. The tech is changing fast. And this is the price range where an older printer is likely to have changed the most compared to newer models.

Then stand up and oppose it being used as an anti immigration symbol. Because after the BNP copted it. Any org using it as a sign opposing immigration. Is very clearly an obviously attempting to use that history to scare. Not as a sign patriot ideals.

They have been under attack from the right since 2010. Well long before, but 2010 on the Tories were successful at embedding biased leadership.

But. The panarama editing thing was wrong on their part. And unnecessary to make their point.

The current attracks from all angles is hardly a suprise when the BBC itself opens itself for such calls of bias.

The delay in the attack is the only strange issues.

Facts don’t have bias.

Those who deny science without both reviewed data, from multiple sources and an alternative hypothesis. Are not expressing bias. They are lieing.

Yeah. But the term “Crime Network” is clearly designed to indicate some form of organised crime.

Invoking / reinforcing fear . When the translation is. Imagrant owned and Family run stores are more likely to offer a helping hand to people going through difficulties.

And just like British families and community friends will often offer underhand assistance to benefit claiments and struggling relatives and friends in their community.

But when folks that look different do it. It’s organised crime.

Also one of the least complicated to fix.

If WE spend our time only wanting the gov to spend time on major issues. The billionaires will run circles around us forcing nothing to improve.

The government is not a single task queue. It can address multiple issues and must.

Def should be that simple.

Unfortunately, over the last 2 decades. We have seen a huge effort from the right wing. To remove that limitation. Mainly funded from the same billionaires that fund such crap in the US where such rules do not exist.

The left needs to work hard to ensure these challenges are both identified and publicised for what they are. An attempt to licence lieing to the public.

Do they honestly think that is a threat.

Such an announcement would be marginally less pleasing. Then Thames waters creditors declaring bankruptcy

Unlike the US. Where its written constitution prevents trump from… eh

Having carte blanche to toxify their nation?

Sorry to grin at you. But in OS theory Linux is known as a monolith kernal. So you choice of words would have given my lecturers a freakout.

But while your terminology is a bit crossed. The ideal you are explaining is fine.

Better Technical way to put it. Linux is just the kernal. Much of the interface you see is actually programs or apps running above that kernal. A d can be changed amd selected.

Windows is also started multipart. But has become less so over time. And it’s single distributer makes it way less obvious. By preventing any competition within it’s internal structure. The original monolithic kernal of Windows was the MS Dos command.com program. But I no lying those of us from the 80s and early 90 remember using it.

Not the same people.

This article is a legal opinion. Not a government one. The gov has not admitted that a genocide is happening. Risk of one is still the closest they have gotten.

The current UK gov is consistent in their arsehollery if nothing else.

It also has had real issues finding funding. And yes many who have worked for it. Have then had real issues finding work outside that field.

So yes by many it has spent a sizable portion of that 65 years seen as not real science. And a waste of money.

Quackery is a term normally saved for medical non science. Not a term I tend to use unless the scientific background is actually false.

Scientists tend to just question the effectiveness and cost of a scientific endever.

Agreed. No sane scientist will say it exists.

The strongest claim would be,. That it is less likely 0 life outside earth exist then some.

But what OP says is far more quack like, although traditionally quack is a term saved for medical lack of science. It feels right here.

As you say. His claim that extra terrestrial life Is on earth is not only without evidence. It opposes much evidence we do have. Like the limitations of distance or any other traveling life within our solar system.

The fact that unidentified things exist on this planet is clear.

Them coming from a extra terrestrial source is not in any way clear. Without any evidence of the transfer of life to or from earth. The idea of extra terrestrial origins of any form of earth bound life is still to be questioned.

You say extraterrestrial life is only recently accepted as feasible by scientist. In this you are correct, mainly due to evidence off the number of plannets.

But no seriose scientist has any reason to accept that life has reached earth. First due to 0 evidence of such life having the ability to travel existing within our own solar system. 2nd from the complete lack of evidence of any form of faster then light gravel from other solar systems. Along with no yet existing evidence of life.

It is in no way scientifically feasable to believe any of your experience is extra terrestrial in origin or alive.

Fucking disgusting that racist little shits like this. Feel comfortable expressing such opinions around schools.

Unfortunately it’s seems these arseholes are being encouraged by government actions. Dispite the vast majority of voters and polling being opposed to their ideals.

Shows how fucking dangerous FPTP can be when 30% plus is all that is needed to rule. Division becomes a political strategy rather then a risk.