Which is the point of their marches, they want a very public presence so like minded people will seek them out and join.
These chodes might not be threatening marching through a major city in daylight, but as the country deteriorates, if 50 or 100 of them show up at your house at night… What’s your plan?
This is just public facing side of the new Klan.
Nah, best he can do is a subscription based virtual machine with as much RAM as you need*
*premium subscription required for >12gb, metered pricing for >20gb usage
I’ve ordered products from some of the brands specifically mentioned, and the quality to price is often great.
Would I buy anything with a battery or an internet connection from them? Probably not. But are many things fine, and likely produced in the same sweat shops as household name brands.
It seems like a stretch to automatically hide every temu-esk brand… The brands themselves don’t even attempt to hide what they are.
What a fucking idiotic take.
The right are actively trying to suppress voting and remove constitutional rights. They’re supporting a pedophile, supporting abhorrent spending, supporting war crimes (in the Caribbean, Venezuela, and the Middle East), abandoning our allies, and embracing the rich and the corruption that enables them. They’re attacking women, healthcare, education, and the scientific method.
These policies don’t take root without the support Republican Voters. Their stupidity does not absolve their responsibility.
Is there some class warfare going on? Sure. Should you still be differentiating between the Right and Left… Abso-fucking-lotely.
By all means, call out the those on the left who are choosing billionaires over voters or are supporting policies that harm the general public, but they are by far the secondary priority.
Fifield, who spent 7 years working for the Heritage Foundation and made all of these accusations a few months ago without any evidence, is the reason why people are so hesitant to take the more recent one seriously.
If the Heritage Foundation is doing anything to take you down, you’re probably doing something right.
From an arborist perspective, usually limiting the trenching to 30% of the root zone (a radius based on the drip line of the tree) will leave keep the tree alive, but it’s still a gamble.
The 30% will include the arc of the circle it cuts off, and if the tree is large enough that it could fall on a house, it’s not worth the risk.
Utility engineer here.
Find a new contractor, yours is working with the tools they have have, but a specialist will be able to cut the roots that have infiltrated the pipe, then run a structural epoxy liner through the old one (called CIPP).
Tree roots look for oxygen, so once you have a solid cured in place pipe, they’ll grow around it instead of trying to intrude.
That doesn’t make those components magically cheaper…
I can upgrade anything in my desktop too, but the 4x32gb ddr5 sticks I paid $200 for in 2024 now cost around $1,600.
That was passed federally in 2010 under the CALM Act
Sure, but either way, it’s not the employee’s problem.
And Federal Devices. If those devices aren’t secure, that’s not the employee’s problem.
Okay, then can you explain what you meant by:
Even in US this “right” was never intended to mean that.
Because if it’s not the well regulated militia thing, I’m unaware.
*That’s the joke
Based on the Iran Deal, he seems more like a bottom to me.
Even in US this “right” was never intended to mean that.
I’m sure you’re going to start going on about Well Regulated Militias, and yet if someone tells you that they are in a militia that is organized and trains together regularly I bet you’re going to double down on your efforts to disarm them.
The court said the old laws focused on people whose substance abuse left them unable to manage their lives, while the federal law broadly covered regular drug users regardless of whether they posed a threat to anyone.
“It’s a good day for the Second Amendment when all nine justices can agree to protect gun rights,” Severino said. "The mere fact of illegal drug use, without more, isn’t enough to justify prosecution for gun ownership. Historically, ‘habitual drunkards’ who habitually lost use of their reason could have their rights restricted, but not just regular drinkers — even including Founding Fathers like John Adams, who drank ‘a tankard of hard cider’ with breakfast, or James Madison, who ‘consumed a pint of whisky daily.’
Seems like an incredibly reasonable take.
Maybe they’re going to purposely target civilians and civilian infrastructure
I really just don’t understand how you’re relating this story to capitalism? Were dealer’s not working in a capitalist way prior to legal weed? Did your dealer just give you weed?
It’s such a reach to blame capitalism here that this clearly is the only arrow in your quiver. Which tells me you’re probably just bad at life, so you blame capitalism for everything.
They probably bought them from Trumpers for an inflated price.
Oh shit? They’re trying the ICE agents who killed American Citizens now?
Or have they reversed the 100 year terrorist sentences for the people exercising their right to assemble?
Maybe you mean that Due Process is required for all individuals again?
I can’t wait to search through the newly released Epstein files.
… It’s not about the hundreds of little cases they’ve been able to stop… It’s about the 20ish massive things they haven’t.