I particularly enjoyed Adobe® Creative Commons™ software and Microsoft Minecraft® Bedrock™ for Workgroups™.

A lot of it isn’t new, or is new but wasn’t published because it was redundant at the time. Everyone who wasn’t wearing blinders already knew Trump is a pedo creep who was best friends with Epstein. Now, finally, thanks to Trump’s broken promise on releasing “the Epstein files,” those blinders are off, or at least weakened and so it’s actually worthwhile to put this stuff out there again. Framing it like it’s some new revelation will get some of the people who ignored it before to maybe consider it this time around.

Pointless nitpick: I don’t think he’s wearing a bald cap, it really looks like the guy partially shaved his head for the bit. That takes some real commitment to do that just to call out the hypocrisy of someone being also shitty.

Wow, this takes me back. This was one of my favorite sets to play with, and I had forgotten it. I was always a little disappointed that the magnet arm couldn’t actually reach the little magnet cargo box in the base. I usually put the robot on the torso-docking hover-platform, and the human in the head/spaceship, on account of the human being safer in an enclosed removedpit, while the robot was less at risk riding exposed to the vacuum of space. I also added some upgraded thrusters to the head from some other set so it could fly faster when detached.

It wasn’t the user’s infrastructure, it was the LLM company’s. The selling point is that it’s all integrated together for you. You explain what you want, the LLM not only codes it, but launches it too. Yes, his screen shots of the LLM “taking responsibility” are idiotic, but so many people don’t understand that LLMs don’t actually understand anything.

“Basically their methodology was that they asked ChatGPT whether the job could be automated,” he explained. “They also asked people whether the job could be automated and then they said ChatGPT and people agreed some portion of the time.”

lol. This is such an idiotic thing to do. “Hey, you know that linguistic pattern matcher that doesn’t actually reason or introspect? Since it can talk, why don’t we just ask it what it can and can’t do?” Seeing this, published by an AI research institute no less, is what inspired the creators of the actually riggourus test the article is about. It inspired me with a desire to smack those idiots upside their empty heads.

Dude went dumpster diving for a name. It’s not theft if they’re throwing it away. One woman’s trash is another man’s treasure.

I thought mayor was a partisan position in every US city. If fact, in the US every elected position is effectively a partisan position, even the rare ones that officially aren’t.

Took me way too long to get that.

People think the stem is too tough, but it just needs to be cooked right. The trick is to start cooking the stem pieces first, then when they just start to be cooked, add the florets. Exact timing depends on the cooking method, but if done right all of it will be tender and tasty.

If I recall correctly, the follow up was the same person complaining about being painfully constipated for several days.

Yeah, I have to agree; if your plastic cup isn’t labeled “coffee”, then why are you even bothering to drink a coke?

It’s been a while, so I must have exaggerated it in my mind. Three days certainly sounds more plausible.

Thanks for reminding me, I’ve been meaning to do this. I’m doing random text edit of them all now. I’ll go back later and have it edit my top comments to a nice site-ban-worthy message.

Took me a bit to realize, but that’s a facepalm gesture.

Yeah, this really depends on what you meant by winning here. Are we actually changing the other person’s mind or do they admit we are right, but still believe otherwise? Are people who witness the argument included? Do people continue to agree indefinitely? Does it change reality to match?

Quick! Somebody call Trump’s attention to what happened. That petty bastard would ram new investigations through ASAP.