• nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Sounds like you know more about encryption than I do, I would hope they can do that but I still think a full off switch for users would be wise though.

    • dracs@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, end to end encryption means its not possible for someone to intercept the message between person A and person B. Nothing stops person B then forwarding the message to person C to report it.

      • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yeah as long as theres an (practically) unfalsifiable way to forward the message that sounds very useful, which sounds like there is based on the response to my first comment.

        • dracs@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Typically end to end encryption includes digital signing of the message so you can verify who the sender was.