• Eduneum@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Thank you! I did read it today.

    Kropotkin wrongly treats capitalist exploitation and wage labor as results of individual moral flaws like greed or slavishness. In reality, they are objective necessities driven by profit maximization and the workers’ lack of means of production.

    By claiming that private property or a monarchy would be harmless among “good” people, Kropotkin reduces systemic power structures to mere vessels of individual morality. However, private property and the state are inherently coercive institutions of exclusion and force, regardless of anyone’s personal character.

    Kropotkin’s reliance on historical progress (such as the abolition of slavery and serfdom, which actually just transitioned people into modern wage labor) fails to provide a rational argument for communism. The case for communism rests on overcoming the irrationality of capitalist production through planned, need-based labor, not on historical optimism.

    Communism is neither a moral training ground to improve human nature nor a shelter to protect people from their own bad instincts. Instead, it is the conscious, collective interest of producers to abolish capital and the state because these systems subjugate their lives to profit and state power.