If the author doesn’t specifically make a declaration in the readme, is there a way to guess how “vibe coded” a project is?
Like I want to know if there is anyone actually in charge… A human who knows at least how to program their own program.
If the author doesn’t specifically make a declaration in the readme, is there a way to guess how “vibe coded” a project is?
Like I want to know if there is anyone actually in charge… A human who knows at least how to program their own program.
Way higher version numbers than should be possible for the project’s age. Really fast minor and patch version bumps, in the order of multiple per day, and/or version bumps in rapid bursts with long periods of nothing.
This sounds reasonable because a lot of single (human) dev projects stay at 0.x or 1.x for years/decades as they slowwly plod along.
Yeah I noticed LLMs are ADDICTED to version numbering everything
It’s actually really annoying