elonmuskszahnbuerste@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoIf a Tesla Cybercab fleet were profitable, Tesla wouldn't sell you oneelectrek.coexternal-linkmessage-square49linkfedilinkarrow-up1428
arrow-up1428external-linkIf a Tesla Cybercab fleet were profitable, Tesla wouldn't sell you oneelectrek.coelonmuskszahnbuerste@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square49linkfedilink
minus-squarepivot_root@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months ago This is most likely just a way to offload liability And to make the owners pay for maintenance and electricity. If they lock the feature behind a higher price tier, a subscription, or a cut of the profits, it’s a low-risk income stream with minimal expenses.
minus-squareartyom@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months ago And to make the owners pay for…electricity. Tesla is an electric utility, they could probably make more money providing it to themselves than passing the costs off to their contractors.
minus-squareboonhet@lemmy.zipBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoDoubt it would be more. Electricity is going up in the US. Selling is more profitable right now
minus-squareartyom@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoI mean as a utility provider, selling more electricity is usually a good thing…
And to make the owners pay for maintenance and electricity.
If they lock the feature behind a higher price tier, a subscription, or a cut of the profits, it’s a low-risk income stream with minimal expenses.
Tesla is an electric utility, they could probably make more money providing it to themselves than passing the costs off to their contractors.
Doubt it would be more. Electricity is going up in the US. Selling is more profitable right now
I mean as a utility provider, selling more electricity is usually a good thing…