After a day and several replies from people. I’ve come to the conclusion that people here are ok with their party and leaders supporting genocide and they attack the questioners (instead of their party leaders) who criticize those who support genocide. Critical thinking is scarce here.

I’m shameful of humanity.

    • when@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If the democrats will ignore our demands and continue their support and funding of genocidal regime then they will lose this election.

        • when@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You seem very happy with this democrat government. But would you start hating them if they include policy like ending support/funding of genocide?

            • Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              threatening to let conservatives further mangle the country when you have a progressive alternative is selfish and incredibly narrow-minded.

              And how exactly is not voting doing that when…

              the democrats are already winning the votes of young and decided voters

              Either the Democrats are comfortably winning (in which case we can vote with our conscience), or they’re not (in which case vocal opposition to genocide might encourage them to change policies to garner our vote).

              The alternative is that nothing will get them to change policies because they’re not interested in our vote. In which case the whole “turn up and the Democrats will move left” theory is nonsense.

                • Ephoron@lemmy.kde.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  none of this is the neat logic game you want it to be.

                  And yet…

                  in this election, Harris is the clear better choice for people who are not selfish.

                  So presumably it is the “neat clear logic game” you want it to be.

                  You haven’t answered any of the criticisms raised against your argument.

                  It’s OK to just disagree with me and explain why, you know. You don’t have to label all opposing arguments as ‘nonsense’ (or misinformation, or ideologically biased, or whatever the latest buzz-term is…). You can just disagree. Humans are marvellous like that, we look at things differently from each other and form different views as a result. We even have this amazing tool ‘rational discourse’ whereby we can dissect those differences. It’s great.

                  If you think one (or more) of my criticisms flawed, then quote it and point out the flaw. Try it, you might like it.

            • when@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think supporting/funding genocide shouldn’t be democratic party policy, it would suit more on far-right. But reality is different. Even after thousands of posts, emails to representatives, cases in court, protests in campuses and rallies. Democrats are eager to support/fund a genocide.

              Democratic party has become a far-right party.