I’m not saying that we should let bees or sheep or any important animals that benefit humans and the ecosystem. But why the hell do we need to maintain wild animals such as tigers and dolphins if they don’t provide food or material for engineering. Seriously why do we need to save some obscure endangered animal if the species itself is deadly too, which is a problem for humans and livestock. It’s okay if the species dies out, we don’t need to make a big fuss about some fuckass animal going extinct. It’s a part of nature and history, nothing will remain the same for centuries.
So what is the purpose of it then? Are the questions controversial because you realize they are after people respond to them, or you know they are controversial and are behaving as if you don’t think they are? Like this thread reads as if you fully believe what you are saying in the original post, so that would imply you don’t believe it is controversial or believe your view should be normal; unless you are being deceptive about it on purpose.