Oh I’m un-banned for arguing against monarchist counter revolutionaries great, the working classes are not by definition the individuals brought under the whip of a vanguard, your monarchism makes them submissive if you succeed because it would be you that would whip it out of them, just like any animal, I am the same, and you are too.
And if you say they are capable of resisting your domination because they are strong, well I sure hope so, but the achieval of a desirable state of affairs would then be more viable if individuals did not adhere to blanquism.
Creating a worker-run democratic system is not “monarchism” because the working class party is disciplined. Phrasemongering and levying absurdist claims like “Lenin was a monarchist” isn’t a coherent point.
No? I specifically criticized your disdain for the working classes.
Oh I’m un-banned for arguing against monarchist counter revolutionaries great, the working classes are not by definition the individuals brought under the whip of a vanguard, your monarchism makes them submissive if you succeed because it would be you that would whip it out of them, just like any animal, I am the same, and you are too.
And if you say they are capable of resisting your domination because they are strong, well I sure hope so, but the achieval of a desirable state of affairs would then be more viable if individuals did not adhere to blanquism.
Drop the whip
Creating a worker-run democratic system is not “monarchism” because the working class party is disciplined. Phrasemongering and levying absurdist claims like “Lenin was a monarchist” isn’t a coherent point.