• modifier@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    You’re the one making the extraordinary claim that this decision had ‘nothing’ to do with massive, nation-wide, broadly covered protests occurring in a hotly contested election year amongst a key demographic.

    So, prove it.

    • Mastengwe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Ahh. So when one person makes a claim that’s unproven, but you believe it- the onus is on the person that asks it to be proven to prove it isn’t?

      Sorry, but that’s not how it works…

      There is zero evidence to support the statement that this has anything to do with protests. ZERO. you cannot prove it.

      • modifier@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ll save us both a lot of frustration and wasted time and simply refer you back to my first comment.

        • Mastengwe@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’ll also save us both a lot of frustration and wasted time and simply refer you back to my first comment.

        • Mastengwe@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Dumb for disagreeing with something you like? Do you insult everyone that disagrees with you?

          I wonder if there’s a way to describe that……

          Hmmmm….