Welcome again to everybody. Make yourself at home. In the time-honoured tradition of our group, here is the weekly discussion thread.
☭ Matrix homeserver and space
☭ Theory discussion group on /c/[email protected]
☭ Find theory on ProleWiki, marxists.org, Anna’s Archive


It definitely sounds like those companies are discriminating against disabled people. I wonder if you’d have better luck not telling them?
I think it’s less purposeful than direct discrimination, the application should have no sign I’ve ticked the box for the disability scheme, but I think that their screening process is just really poor.
I reckon they’re either using AI to batch shortlist and don’t really care about when it makes mistakes, or their shortlisters are having to wade through so many applications they’re not giving enough attention to each one and incorrectly scoring them. This then has the downstream effect of being indirectly discriminating, because they actually have to justify what essential criteria I have missed to deny me an interview, but for anyone else accidentally missed during shortlisting they can just lie and say they didn’t make the cut because there were so many strong candidates.
Having chatted with people recruiting in this area before, they’re getting like 500-1000 applicants for each role so their shortlisting has had to speed up to keep the process to a sane timeline. This has pushed them to make far more mistakes than I’ve ever had to deal with during the shortlisting phase. I used to get an interview almost every single time I applied for a role, and would perform well enough to be in the top 2 or 3 candidates if I failed to get the role. Now I’m just being screened out at the application phase.
Gotcha. So with the extreme application volume, they’re certainly not reviewing even most of them thoroughly. I haven’t done it often, but apparently feeding your CV/resume and the job description to AI can help if they’re using an HRIS, in case you haven’t tried that already. Best of luck, comrade!