• PugJesus@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    My argument was in the abstract. Although one should never discount the possibility of the world changing, I’m inclined to agree that the US is unlikely to have a legitimate use for activating the draft with the world as it is now. But the draft, as a concept, is a tool that democratic governments are not wrong to hold onto in case of emergency.

    • imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not sure I understand how forced service through a draft. Is any different than voluntary service when your country is being invaded?

      The draft implies you don’t get a choice in the matter. I really don’t understand anyone who thinks the psychology behind people who Don’t want to be soldiers being pushed into being soldiers is going to be a healthy army

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        There are numerous reasons why one wouldn’t volunteer, but still willingly serve in a draft. Many people feel obligation towards their family, and volunteering would be abrogating that responsibility. The draft removes that issue of internal guilt. Furthermore, drafts can preserve needed skills at home - in WW2, volunteers were often turned away and told to wait for their draft card to turn up, because at that moment their profession was needed for the war industry.

        I would highly recommend reading the accounts of soldiers who have been drafted in wars that weren’t wildly unpopular with the domestic population and/or 20 year occupations.

        In WW2, the vast majority of our military forces were drafted, both US and UK.