• Frog-Brawler@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    The Supreme Court agrees that a single state doesn’t get to change a presidential ballot. The GOP’s candidate is in fact a criminal and should not be on the ballot for that alone; but that’s the best they can bring to the table.

      • Frog-Brawler@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I guess you forgot about the E. Jean Carrol case that he was found guilty in. That’s just one… I like my presidential candidates to not have criminal records.

        • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Keeping up his hard sometimes I know, but this thread was about the supreme Court decision in regards to keeping him on the ballot.

          • Frog-Brawler@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Tunnel vision eh? Another horse with blinders. My statement yesterday was that the GOP should have put up a candidate without a criminal background.

            • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              And the DNC shouldn’t be offering up a candidate that’s enabling ethnic cleansing.

              Your original comment specifically mentioned ballots

              • Frog-Brawler@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                And you’re mentioning the outcome of a Supreme Court decision that never happened. Don’t worry about the Great Replacement; you and the rest of your ilk of degenerates will still be able to find a seat at the back of the classroom indefinitely.

                  • Frog-Brawler@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    No, not that decision… this one is where the courts decided that individual states cannot remove him from the ballot. Where was this supreme court decision you mentioned that they decided he should not be in prison? You are clearly confused.