• db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 days ago

    No but you see, the people who do not have the capacity to decide for themselves, somehow have the capacity to select one person among them who has the monopoly of violence to decide for all of them. Clearly this is completely logical.

    • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      are the alt left liberals we used to call “tankies” until they claimed that was something only right wingers called all leftists behaving poorly again?

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        Hah, well yes, but not relevant to this meme. My comment applies equally to liberal and state capitalist politics tbh :D

        • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Oh for sure. Any coagulation of power into a single point is bad. Your comment just read to me like you’ve been having to debunk the value of vanguard party politics and an ML state dictator a lot lately.

          But just as bad is a capitalist who believes in no power but the power of a banknote (banks can only exist through theft, and banknotes exist as proxied violence) or a fascist who explicitly aligns their countries industrial and military interests without concern for the banking implications. Didn’t mean to imply your comment only applied to one thing

  • Soot [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    A fair observation, but doesn’t it cut both ways?

    If we can’t keep a democratic state with built-in systems for accountability and equity, in check, how can we possibly hold each other accountable without such systems?