Rimu published yet another hit piece against the /0 instance and this time posted it in his own instance comms as well. One of his mods jumped in, admitted they don’t know anything about anything, but nevertheless felt confident enough to state their opinion as fact and in the process insult all of us collectively, then stickied his opinion for good measure.

So I decided to reply sarcastically, at which point that mod insulted me and locked the thread, which is apparently a feature in piefed which simply hides/deletes further replies in that thread, but since it’s not a feature in lemmy, it appears to function like a shadow delete.

This is what my last reply would have been.

(Yes I’m being snarky, but that “I’m so mature” bullshit just rubs me the wrong way.)
In my opinion, using mod powers to get the last insult in, is just bastard behaviour.


If you don’t ban people for reasons generated by LLMs, why did you put the output of an LLM at the top of your reason for banning someone?
This makes question 3 even more pertinent.
Follow the discussions and you’ll see unruffled explaining what happened
Flatworm7591’s comments do not add clarity, which is why I’m asking you here.
I prefer transparency and straightforward language. Not this.
Bring it up in the appropriate comms, it’s out of scope for this thread
I don’t see why it’s inappropriate here, but I made a comment with the same text in the right community and mentioned your statements on it
https://piefed.social/comment/11221507
@[email protected] comments?
You’ve already been told.
I replied elsewhere.