• refalo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    My understanding is that after the war, the US agreed to defend Japan. And Japan is still allowed to defend itself against others too. I don’t understand how what you’re saying is related at all.

    • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      The US occupied Japan. The agreement wasn’t exactly one made by equals. It was the same kind of deal as the Marshall Plan.

      Which parts of what I said don’t seem related?

        • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Only until 1952

          De jure, yes. But also what is your point? Do you think this contradicts anything I said?

          Everything you’re saying sounds like a strawman argument.

          A straw man argument is where you pretend someone else is making an argument that they aren’t because it is rhetorically easier to address.

          At which point have I done that even once?