• self@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    holy shit, imagine getting a second chance to not be a fucking debatelord and doubling down this hard

    off you fuck

    • blakestacey@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      People just out here acting like a fundamentally, inextricably unreliable and unethical technology has a “use case”

      smdh

      • self@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        fucking right! there’s this unearned assumption that just because the tech’s been invented, it must have worth. and, like, no? there’s so many dead ends in science and technology, and notoriously throwing money at something doesn’t change its fundamental nature

        and now I’m pissed and trying to decide if it’s even worth explicitly adding “don’t be a debatelord asshole” to the TechTakes sidebar, cause it’s not like they’re gonna stop

        • blakestacey@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          “We’re not saying it doesn’t have its flaws, but you need to appreciate the potential of the radium removedring!”

        • froztbyte@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          notoriously throwing money at something doesn’t change its fundamental nature

          to wildly abword a phrase I’ve seen elsewhere: “idiocy can remain solvent longer than you can”