Just as in almost all other cross-posts, someone missing the point.

And what point is that?

That they used AI for coding is not great, but responding by saying they simply won’t declare what is AI and what is not, is just childish.

I think all the backlash they are facing is 99% directed at their tone-deaf response.

This was also my point. Hiding what was AI made, just because people didn’t like it, is not the way to do it.

Could an open source project go back and remove and replace all the work of one contributor?