Video shared from a Mastodon user.

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m sorry but there is no way people walking beat cyclists which kind of pokes holes in this.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s relative to the amount of space a bicycle takes up including a safe following gap. The pedestrians only have to go 28 metres.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      The real issue is that there isn’t a real world scenario quite like this. We don’t just line people up at a line. Real traffic/transit has a lot more factors around optimization.

      For example if the distance to be traveled was 1km, then people walking would be dead last.

      It’s an interesting simulation, and does help make a point, but it definitely over simplifies.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        We absolutely line people up at stops; that’s what traffic is.

        As much as the example stretches circumstances, everyone who’s driven is familiar with the number of traffic lights you often go through, and it can get you to think about the amount of interruption when this example is multiplied.

        It can even go one further because pedestrians crossing other pedestrians don’t even have to stop to wait for perpendicular movement.

        Obviously, pedestrians would handle very long distances worse, but navigation in dense areas is often a paced jog, not a sprint.