• webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think what they claimed “this is what real artists can do with this technology”

    Which appears exactly what this video is.

    • self@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      weird OpenAI neglected to mention that what the real artists were doing with the technology was spend a lot of time heavily editing and fucking rotoscoping its output to look barely passable

      but the result was still uninteresting garbage that’s only barely notable if you think generative AI did it, and we’ve established that all the coherent parts of this were done (as usual) with the hard work of a team of uncredited humans

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I am confused, was the expectation really a magic automate entire movie clip button? Because thats not how any kind of creative generative ai works in my experience.

        llms are not sentient, they cannot perform “intentional reasoning” of course the showcased art is a human work. Of course the raw output has hallucinations, gpt4 is not except of that either but its still a great drafter.

        The results stands to appear technologically very impressive. This kind of thing was perceived as never to be possible and improves quickly.

        No cameras, no physical shooting, no actors. Just a few creatives and something to compute.