• Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    Note the age: 19. They’re stretching the definition of ‘minor’ to restrict more people. Thus is why we we need to protect LGBT kids

    • Mika@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      It also goes in the same package with “you can marry at 14”.

    • dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think it sets a precedent so that the difference to extend it to all adults is not a matter of legal application to minors vs adults, it establishes that adults could have this care restricted from the start. Not that I’m a lawyer or understand whether this distinction is as relevant as it seems to me as a layperson, but … I do wonder.

      • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s exactly what they’re doing. And that’s why I receiving grounds too people who want to be transphobic specifically to Children is always a bad idea. They’re just the weakest link we must protect or we all fall.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Interesting strategy, and it looks like it has a high chance of success. The wording in that contract is pretty damn specific. Good news is always welcome!