• Hypx@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    You are not reading my post. The entire set of steps is exactly the same number of steps as charging a battery. Both are electrochemical processes and have similar losses. In theory, we can make a fuel cell that operates just as efficient as a li-ion battery.

    The other point is that the process of moving hydrogen around is cheaper than moving energy via electricity. Losses of distribution are similar too. People are forgetting how big and complex the grid is.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      How is it the same number of steps? You’re taking from the grid and putting in the car OR you’re taking from the grid, doing electrolysis, liquifying, transporting, storing and now you’re finally putting it in the car.

      To transport the hydrogen you’re using tons of energy to liquify it, you still need to transport the electricity to do that, why not simply use the electricity in the cars directly then if you’re going to transport it anyway?

      It’s funny because all experts that have a realistic outlook on the subject say the same thing, hydrogen for cars is stupid and inefficient and greewashing.

      But hey, continue believing what you want, not as if you had any power over the market and you’ll have to realize at some point that hydrogen cars were just something manufacturers tried to make a thing in order to not have to invest in making EVs.

      • Hypx@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Because a fuel cell is type of electrochemical device. It is literally a type of battery. So whether you are using a li-ion battery or a fuel cell, you are turning chemical energy into electrical energy. Also, the process of distributing hydrogen is comparable to the grid and has similar losses. The latter of which will see a dramatic reduction in efficiency as more renewable energy go onto the grid. Specifically due to the need for energy storage.

        There are no experts saying hydrogen for cars is stupid. You are just hearing a lot of pro-BEV marketing and their fanboys. Of course, some of them pretend to be experts, but they are not.

        In the long run, BEVs are going to die off because they are not economical vehicles. They cost far more than conventional cars and require huge amounts of new minerals for the raw materials used to make them. If the goal is just to have an EV, then the answer is a type of EV that does not so much raw material nor cost so much. That leads to ideas like PHEVs or FCEVs.