• eskimofry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    Having an over abundance in one part pf the world and scarcity in another isn’t a world of abundance.

    You’re so close to realizing wherever humans settled had enough to sustain civilization. It’s the plundering, wars, genocides, privatization of national respurces that cause the scarcity.

    • Abundance114@lemmy.worldBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      wherever humans settled had enough to sustain

      You do understand that “had” is past tense, meaning that we do not currently have it, right?

      • eskimofry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        and why do you think that is? Not plundering of resources and redistribution of them upwards?

        • Abundance114@lemmy.worldBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          why do you think that is?

          That’s a deep hole and I don’t know if you’ll appreciate it’s darkness.