cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/23562018

Mere days after photos of a 35x35 surfaced, Preston Alden has unveiled a 49x49:

It weighs 30 kg, stands 34 cm tall, and consists of 13,827 pieces. Every piece of the cube was 3D printed using PETG plastic (aside from the bolts and springs).

Congratulations to Preston on such an incredible achievement. I’ve never seen olzing on such a large puzzle!

More info on the twistypuzzles forum: https://twistypuzzles.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=39559

        • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          3 months ago

          Do the algorithms stay the same regardless of rows?

          Yes, exactly. The same algorithms used to solve a 6x6 can be used to solve an 7x7, or a 10x10, or a 49x49. You just need to repeat them for each layer.

        • HarriPotero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 months ago

          Even-dimensioned cubes (4x4x4, 6x6x6, …) are harder because they introduce some parity errors. Odd-dimensioned keep their fever center piece in the right spot.

          Otherwise the size just makes it more tedious. I keep up with a 4x4x4. I had a gigaminx dodecahedron that I solved a few times, but it just made my hands tired from the weight and kept popping out pieces because of their tinyness.

          • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            fever center piece

            Typo?

            gigaminx dodecahedron

            just made my hands tired from the weight and kept popping out pieces

            What brand of gigaminx did you have? My old MF8 gigaminx is a bit stiff, but it’s never popped on me. I’ve heard good things about the more modern YuXin and DianSheng ones.

            As an aside, are you subscribed to [email protected]? Would be great if we could get more people on there.

            • HarriPotero@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              What brand of gigaminx did you have?

              I can’t recall. It’s been well over ten years. I think I solved it two or three times. It was just tedious. Whatever cheap brand they had on dealextreme at the time.

              • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                dealextreme

                “Now that’s a name I’ve not heard in a long time…” :)

                Whatever cheap brand they had

                If I recall correctly, the first brand to release a gigaminx was Cube4You, second was MF8, third was Shengshou. Any of these ring a bell?

        • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          For record-breaking puzzles like this, the challenge is more in designing and building a functional puzzle. Solving it is comparatively easy, if tedious.

    • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      The difficulty would come more in manipulating the individual layers, than the actual mental process of solving it.

      • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        I feel like this would be super fragile and internal structures bend a lot with twisting.