You countered their hypothetical with another hypothetical that assumes that theirs doesn’t come to pass.
Logically speaking, it’s the equivalent of someone asking if they can have steak in stead of pasta and you saying they can’t because they’ll be too full for steak after the pasta.
If they end up changing the laws such that people over 65 can’t be elected, he will be too old.
Tim Walz is 60…
Just one year older than Kamala.
Only 6 months actually (April vs October)
Yes I know that, what’s your point?
That he isn’t 65 yet…
Yes true, but he is not the president candidate, so he has to wait until Kamela hopefully finishes her presidency. And then he will be 68.
And that is too old in my opinion.
…do you know what the word “instead” means?
Sigh… 🙄
So their fantasies are fine but my fantasy about age limits, that accepts they won’t switch Kamala is bad.
You countered their hypothetical with another hypothetical that assumes that theirs doesn’t come to pass.
Logically speaking, it’s the equivalent of someone asking if they can have steak in stead of pasta and you saying they can’t because they’ll be too full for steak after the pasta.
And I was playing a different game, I see your hypothetical with a different hypothetical. But I see now that’s a big no no.
You’re just in the wrong conversation here. This thread is talking about present time.
Your comment higher up was taking it to future tense.
Okay a big no no, I see.