When reactionaries say: “Why do we always have to put ourselves and our cultures last by not serving pork in school canteens because of muslims or allowing underage girls to wear a hijab in school, to let their families oppress them? Why do we let people immigrants live off our government benefits when they haven’t paid a single euro in taxes before they came here?”

How do you respond to it? I honestly don’t know because these thoughts are so stupid they never even cross my mind so I never thought about it much.

  • marl_karx@lemmygrad.mlOPEnglish
    4·
    4 months ago
    1. The choice of clothing has no correlation with the chance of getting SA as you suggest
    2. You are acting as though all Europeans have the same class interests (of oppressing and enslaving others) as their ruling class, which is just nonsensical.
    3. You are right that Europeans went everywhere and acted like they owned the place, but the Taino did not pay a tax, Columbus went there and declared the PEOPLE and their land as the PROPERTY of the spanish crown, there was no mutual agreement
    4. I agree that pornography should be banned

    What you are saying makes no sense for a large part, you are right on certain things but analuze everything from this metaphysical standpoint where everything revolves about rape as a cause and motivation which is just devoid of any historical materialist analysis I am sorry, your comment did not help me in the slightest but have a nice day. It could also be that I didnt understand it the way you intended to because english is not my first language, but I fail to see a coherent message in this text.