• Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    If second worst always wins and Trump beat Clinton, you’re saying that Trump was second worst to Clinton.

    As always with centrists, abuse is what you use in lieu of defensible positions.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Oh I see you back to making strawman and calling names again? Is that really all you have. Just so you know that’s rhetorical question.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            I already replied to you. You made the idiotic assertion that second worst always wins. I countered it by saying that Trump won in 2016 and wasn’t second worst.

            Since you can’t take being called out on being so obviously wrong about this, you did the only thing any centrist ever does when they’re wrong: start slinging abuse.

            • Eldritch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Do you haven’t posted an actual serious reply to any response I make you in this whole chain. Not just that one. But it was obvious that that when you were not replying in good faith. Which is your modus operandi. All you can do is call me wine and split hair in order to find any technical out.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                You said something provably false and evidently expect me to immediately and unquestioningly accept it as incontrovertible fact. You can’t admit you’re wrong.

                Do you haven’t posted an actual serious reply to any response I make you in this whole chain.

                The only thing you accept as serious is agreeing with you about everything. Or maybe being to the right of you.

                • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I said something that any reasonable person in the context it was being discussed would have understood that the second worse always winning was in the context of the absolute worst not winning. If the absolute worst wins. Then yes of course the second worst doesn’t win. But I made the mistake of assuming that you were a reasonable person.

                  Nope I accept people giving me serious replies all the time that don’t agree with me. I find having a discussion with someone in good faith whether or not they agree can be very informative and refreshing. Having a discussion with you is tedious and pointless. Because you are nothing but bad faith.