• Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    You could dispute the genocidal bit but you cannot in good faith argue that the communist party wasn’t dictatorial.

    In what manner was the Communist Party “dictatorial?” It held immense power, yes, but it wasn’t 1 dude deciding everything, there was worker participation in how it ran and the party itself was democratically run. There was corruption, yes, but it wasn’t a dictatorship either.

    And I believe the OPs point is that that’s a bad thing.

    We shouldn’t be basing our politics and imagery today off the guy who fucked socialism for a century.

    How, exactly, did Lenin “fuck socialism for a century?”

    • trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      In what manner was the Communist Party “dictatorial?” It held immense power, yes, but it wasn’t 1 dude deciding everything,

      Ah yes, as long as there is at least 2 dudes deciding everything it’s not a dictatorship.

      there was worker participation in how it ran and the party itself was democratically run.

      As long as you liked the way that the party wanted things to be, yes.

      How, exactly, did Lenin “fuck socialism for a century?”

      His party went on to encourage other revolutionary groups to adapt the anti-socialist Leninist-Stalinist structure, at times actively sabotaging socialist movements that were structured differently.

      In those times you either fell behind the ML party line or had no support from the international movement, the russian communists absolutely fucked it all up.