You misunderstand, there’s no ambiguity on my part, but instead understanding that there are those on the fence who may interpret it differently, and acknowledging that to know how best to respond.
For example, if it was brought up that what he really meant was that it’d be his second term, then the response would be “why wouldn’t he want you to vote after his second term?”
You misunderstand, there’s no ambiguity on my part, but instead understanding that there are those on the fence who may interpret it differently, and acknowledging that to know how best to respond.
For example, if it was brought up that what he really meant was that it’d be his second term, then the response would be “why wouldn’t he want you to vote after his second term?”