• WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 months ago

    You missed the part where news organizations are not a singular monolith but rather composed of numerous individuals that don’t all feel/think the same way let alone hold the same opinions in an op-ed.

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      4 months ago

      You’re not wrong. It is however notable that the NYT’s editorial stance on Biden’s performance and place in the Democratic strategy was a monolith, and one that was misaligned with both the voters’ opinions and the objective reality, up until a couple of days ago possibly in my opinion because word of some level of lost subscribers started reaching back up to the monolith’s office.

      • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s all fine and well, but this is a contributing writer. She’s not even an employee of the NYT.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          That would only matter to the IRS. Or someone really really into the details of journalism. If you are one of those seven people, kudos.

          • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            The NYT regularly publishes opinion columns from wildly different perspectives. Only a week ago Matthew Walter, who could arguably be described as a conservative Christian nationalist, wrote a contributing opinion column discouraging people from voting.

            It doesn’t “only matter to the IRS.” Not understanding what an opinion column and a contributing writer are and how they function within a news organization is simply media illiteracy.

            Kudos.

      • a lil bee 🐝@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I really agree with both of you here. While there was an article or two posted with the opposite narrative, the NYT used their editorial discretion in a fairly flagrant way on this issue. It stood in stark contrast to other issues that they have gone out of their way to keep a neutral stance on as an overall paper (which I applaud). I’m not opposed to the newsroom, editorial team, or contributing writers having a stance unlike mine. I’m not the type to say “fuck all the media” all the time and think they’re generally diverse groups of professionals trying their best and sometimes failing. The fact that the NYT op-ed page and front page were just plastered in a single perspective though, without an opposing narrative, was just really blatant on this issue.

        I was one of those canceled subs. I canceled WaPo after their disastrous leadership developments too. I’m basically running on cables and international outlets now, which is a real shame because I like to read other perspectives presented well, which the op-ed teams at those agencies are capable of doing.

        • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Yeah. It’s a shame. I feel like the vast majority of the staff in both places are competent professionals laboring away in a profession that’s badly badly needed, and badly badly under attack, in this country, and it feels unfair to shit on their work product when as far as I can tell the bulk of the problems are coming down from above them and they probably dislike them a lot more intensely than I do.

          At the same time, you can’t just ignore it, if some organization is trying to support the fascist winning the election. Fuck the NYT until further notice is my feeling. WaPo has been writing a couple of weird as hell stories too (e.g. Trump is going to save NATO), but I still have my subscription to them.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, they must have lied and made us all remember Biden’s perfect debate performance was actually awful.

    • fishos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Remind me again how many local news stations are owned by ClearChannel again? Do you not remember the video showing local morning broadcasts from around the country and them all being the exact same script repeated verbatim?

      No, no we don’t have a wide swath of sources. We have many disguised as independent, but the sad fact is, few are.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      No, the New York Times has a personal vendetta against Biden for some reason Biden stans are never able to identify because they can’t pretend the Times is Russian.